Specialists' Article
YANG Jun, LIU Jia, ZHANG Linchen, MA Fenghua, QIANG Jinwei, GU Yajia, LI Haiming
Objective: To investigate the conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) and to improve the diagnostic accuracy preoperatively. Methods: The clinical and conventional MRI data of patients confirmed by surgery and pathology at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University from February 2011 to January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional MRI features of the tumors were evaluated including size, location, mass characteristics, loculi, signal intensity of the cystic fluid, the signal intensity of solid component on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), enhancement, ascites, peritoneal seedings, lymph-node involvement and the display of ipsilateral normal ovarian. The differences of these conventional MRI features between serous BOT (SBOT) and mucinous BOT (MBOT) were also compared. Results: A total of 148 BOT patients were included. BOT occurred predominantly in younger women (mean age 40±15). SBOT and MBOT were the two commonest histological subtypes, accounting for 55.4% (82/148) and 29.1% (43/148), respectively. Among the 82 cases of SBOT, 41.5% (34/82) showed bilateral ovarian masses, and 116 masses were found on conventional MRI. Most showed mainly cystic masses (47.4%, 55/116), followed by solid masses (31.0%, 36/116) and mixed cystic-solid masses (21.6%, 25/116). Of all cystic and mixed cystic-solid masses, most were unilocular (75.0%, 60/80) and the signal of cystic fluid was uniformity. The solid component in all mass appeared as papillary projections, most showed a heterogeneous hyper-intensity on T2WI (83.6%, 97/116) and hypo-/iso-intensity on DWI (65.5%, 76/116). The branching papillary projections with hypo-intense fibrous stalks on T2WI were observed in 45 of all masses (38.8%, 45/116) and all 36 solid masses displayed this sign. The ipsilateral normal ovarian tissues were seen in 76.7% (89/116) masses. All patients with MBOT were unilateral cystic tumors with a bulky volume (100.0%, 43/43). Honeycomb loculi were seen 79.1% (34/43) masses. The signal of cystic fluid was heterogeneous, with a mixed low-high signal on T1WI (83.7%, 36/43) and a contained hypo-intensity (41.9%, 18/43) or a heterogeneous iso- to hyper-intensity on T2WI (37.2% 16/43). Most solid components appeared as irregularly thickened septa (81.4%, 35/43), which showed mild-to-moderate enhancement. And 10 masses (23.3%, 10/43) contained “pseudo-solid” areas- T2WI low signal zones rich in mucinous microcysts. Other less common type of BOT did not show some characteristic features, most of which were similar to SBOT. Tumor size, location, mass characteristics, loculi, signal intensity of the cystic fluid, the signal intensity of solid component on T2WI and DWI, enhancement, peritoneal seedings, and the display of ipsilateral normal ovarian differed significantly between SBOTs and MBOTs (all P<0.001). Conclusion: On conventional MRI, BOT have some characteristic features, which are helpful for the accurate diagnosis preoperatively, and can also effectively distinguish SBOT from MBOT.