Comparative study of gastroesophageal contrast-enhanced ultrasound, endoscopy, X-ray barium meal in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

GAO Sufang; GUO Ziyu; ZENG Xianhui; QIN Luohao; LIU Meijuan; SUN Jianglian; GAO Lihua

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparative study of gastroesophageal contrast-enhanced ultrasound, endoscopy, X-ray barium meal in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

更新时间：2025-12-15

- Comparative study of gastroesophageal contrast-enhanced ultrasound, endoscopy, X-ray barium meal in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Vol. 25, Issue 4, Pages: 341-344(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东省东莞市茶山医院超声科,广东,东莞,523382
  2. 广东省东莞市茶山医院内科,广东,东莞,523382
  3. 广东省东莞市茶山医院病案室,广东,东莞,523382
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published Online：11 January 2017，
  
  Published：11 January 2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高素芳,郭子玉,曾宪辉,等. 胃食管超声造影、胃镜、X线钡餐造影对胃食管反流病诊断的对比研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2016, 25(4): 341-344
DOI：

高素芳,郭子玉,曾宪辉,等. 胃食管超声造影、胃镜、X线钡餐造影对胃食管反流病诊断的对比研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2016, 25(4): 341-344 DOI：

摘要

目的：

比较分析胃食管超声造影、胃镜、X线钡餐造影诊断胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease，GERD)的价值。

方法：

对50例主诉胃灼痛、反酸、反食、胸背部疼痛等经临床拟诊GERD的患者同时进行胃食管超声造影、胃镜、X线钡餐造影检查，比较3种方法对GERD的检出率和诊断价值。

结果：

胃食管超声造影检出38例GERD(阳性率76%)，未检出12例(阴性率24%)；胃镜检出19例GERD(阳性率38%)，未检出31例(阴性率62%)；X线钡餐造影检出16例GERD(阳性率32%)，未检出34例(阴性率68%)。3种方法之间检出率差异有统计学意义。胃食管超声造影与胃镜、胃食管超声造影与X线钡餐造影比较，检出率差异有统计学意义。

结论：

胃食管超声造影可直观、实时显示有无反流，较胃镜、X线钡餐造影诊断GERD更有价值，可作为GERD的筛查手段。

Abstract

Objective:

To compare and analyze the values of gastroesophageal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)

endoscopy and X-ray barium meal examination in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods:

A total of 50 cases presenting heartburn

acid reflux

regurgitation

chest and back pain were clinically diagnosed with GERD. They were inspected by gastroesophageal CEUS

endoscopy and X-ray barium meal examination

and the GERD detection rates of the three methods were compared.

Results:

38 cases of GERD were detected by CEUS (positive rate of 76%)

19 cases of GERD were detected by endoscopy

(positive rate of 38%)

and 16 cases of GERD were detected by X-ray barium meal examination (positive rate of 32%) The detection rates of CEUS

endoscopy and X-ray barium meal examination were significantly different. There were significant differences in GERD detection rate between CEUS and endoscopy

and between CEUS and X-ray barium meal examination.

Conclusion:

Gastroesophageal CEUS can visually and real-time display reflux. It is of higher value in the diagnosis of GERD than endoscopy and X-ray barium meal examination

and can be used as a screening tool for GERD.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1804

下载量

CNKI被引量

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Annual progress in ultrasound clinical research on liver diseases in China in 2024

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: debates, focus areas and emerging perspectives

The diagnostic value of molecular imaging in treatment-related cardiotoxicity of malignancy

Skin ultrasound: progress in 2023 and future challenges

A study on the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in adjusting O-RADS grading of ovarian adnexal masses

Related Author

Hong HAN

Qing LU

Yuli ZHU

Peili FAN

Huixiong XU

Sirui WANG

Yuting SHEN

Boyang ZHOU

Related Institution

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University

Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering of Fudan University

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging

Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

AI问答

⁰