Rectal diffusional kurtosis imaging: clinical value in detection of rectal cancer compared with diffusion weighted imaging

CAO Xisheng; CHEN Yunbin; CHENG Xiao; WEI Wei; HU Chunmiao

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Rectal diffusional kurtosis imaging: clinical value in detection of rectal cancer compared with diffusion weighted imaging

更新时间：2025-12-15

- Rectal diffusional kurtosis imaging: clinical value in detection of rectal cancer compared with diffusion weighted imaging
- Vol. 26, Issue 5, Pages: 341-344(2017)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published Online：08 December 2017，
  
  Published：08 December 2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
曹喜生,陈韵彬,程虓,等. 直肠扩散峰度成像与扩散加权成像定量参数反映直肠癌组织学特性的优劣[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2017, 26(5): 341-344
DOI：

曹喜生,陈韵彬,程虓,等. 直肠扩散峰度成像与扩散加权成像定量参数反映直肠癌组织学特性的优劣[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2017, 26(5): 341-344 DOI：

摘要

目的：

比较扩散峰度成像(diffusional kurtosis imaging，DKI)与扩散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging，DWI)定量参数反映直肠癌组织学特性的优劣。

方法：

20例直肠癌患者及23例健康志愿者经过3.0T磁共振DKI扫描。扫描参数：采用5个b值(

=0、500、1 000、1 500、2 000 s/mm

)，扩散敏感梯度场同时取X、Y和Z轴3个方向。健康组与直肠癌组定量参数[平均表观扩散系数(mean diffusion，MD)、平均表峰度系数(mean kurtosis，MK)、表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient，ADC)

]

比较采用两独立样本t检验及曲线下面积(area under curve，AUC)分析。

结果：

健康组MD、MK及ADC均值分别为1.3710

-3

/s、0.960.11、(0.760.12)10

-3

/s，直肠癌组MD、MK及ADC均值分别为(1.100.12)10

-3

/s、1.220.16、(0.600.06)10

-3

/s，差异有统计学意义。诊断直肠癌的MD值具有最大的AUC (0.928)，MK值的AUC (0.909)居中，ADC值的AUC最小(0.907)。

结论：

初步研究结果支持DKI能反映直肠癌组织结构的复杂性，其定量参数MD和MK比ADC对直肠癌组织结构的复杂性更敏感。

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the quantitative parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for assessment of the histological characteristics of rectal cancer.

Methods:

Twenty rectal cancer patients and twenty-three healthy volunteers underwent DKI scans (

500

1 000

1 500

2 000 s/mm

respectively; three diffusion directions). The values of mean diffusion (MD)

mean kurtosis (MK)

apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pathologic findings between the two groups were compared using independent sample t test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results:

The values of MD

MK and ADC in healthy volunteers were 1.3710-3 mm2/s

0.960.11

(0.760.12)10

-3

respectively

and in rectal cancer patients were (1.100.12)10

-3

1.220.16

(0.600.06)10

-3

respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (

0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for MD value (0.928) could better distinguish rectal cancer from healthy volunteers than that for MK value (0.909) and ADC value (0.907).

Conclusion:

The preliminary findings suggest that DKI can predict rectal cancer. The parameters MD and MK are better than ADC in predicting rectal cancer.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1489

下载量

CNKI被引量

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer using MRI radiomics models based on multiple machine learning algorithms

Radiomics based on RESOLVE ADC in identification of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer

High resolution T2WI image-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of perineural invasion in rectal cancer

Prediction of pathological nodal stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using the interaction between tumor features and lymph node features from pretreatment MRI in rectal cancer　

Research progress of quantitative assessment of MRI and radiomics for lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer

Related Author

Lu LI

Wen BU

Qiaoyu SUN

Wei WANG

Yuwen ZHANG

Haidong JIANG

Aiqi CHEN

Junjie SHEN

Related Institution

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University

Department of Radiology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University

Department of Pathology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University

GE Healthcare

Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital

AI问答

⁰