Study on the diagnostic efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters within voxels in stage of rectal cancer before operation

ZHAO Zhiwei; DONG Zhanfei

doi:10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.01.003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Study on the diagnostic efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters within voxels in stage of rectal cancer before operation

更新时间：2025-12-15

- Study on the diagnostic efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters within voxels in stage of rectal cancer before operation
- Vol. 30, Issue 1, Pages: 16-22(2021)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.01.003
  CLC：
- Published Online：28 February 2021，
  
  Published：28 February 2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵志伟,董占飞. 体素内不相干运动参数在直肠癌术前分期中的诊断效能研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2021, 30(1): 16-22 https://doi.

org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.01.003
赵志伟,董占飞. 体素内不相干运动参数在直肠癌术前分期中的诊断效能研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2021, 30(1): 16-22 https://doi. DOI： 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.01.003.

org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.01.003 DOI：

摘要

目的：

探讨体素内不相干运动（intravoxel incoherent motion，IVIM）参数在直肠癌术前分期中的诊断效能。

方法：

选取2018年6月2019年3月于新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院及石河子大学医学院第一附属医院接受直肠癌手术的97例直肠癌患者为研究对象，患者术前均进行磁共振成像（magnetic resonance imaging，MRI）及IVIM检查，并进行术后病理学分期，分析直肠癌术前IVIM参数在不同T分期、淋巴结转移及非转移的差异，以及IVIM参数（

*和

值）与血管内皮生长因子（vascular endothelial growth factor，VEGF）和微血管密度（microvascular density，MVD）的相关性。

结果：

直肠癌术前IVIM参数（

、

*、

值）在不同T分期（T

与T

）之间差异有统计学意义（均

＜0.05）；单因素方差分析结果发现，

值在T分期（T

与T

）中诊断效能最高；多因素logistic分析结果发现，

、

*、

值3个参数综合诊断效能最高。在单纯T

和T

期两组之间，IVIM参数

、

*值差异均有统计学意义（

均＜0.05）；单因素方差分析发现，

值在T

与T

期中诊断效能最高；多因素logistic分析发现，IVIM参数

、

*这2个参数综合诊断效能最高。在直肠癌淋巴结转移及非转移方面，IVIM参数仅

值差异有统计学意义（

＜0.05）。将IVIM参数在直肠癌淋巴结转移及非转移的差异性比较中差异有统计学意义的D值进行单因素方差分析发现，

值阈值为0.78210

-3

/s时，曲线下面积（area under curve，AUC）为0.635

，阳性预测值（positive predictive value，PPV）为67.65%，阴性预测值（negative predictive value，NPV）为71.21%，灵敏度为83.37%，特异度为49.26%。对45例患者术后标本进行VEGF和MVD分析，并将VEGF和MVD与IVIM参数（

*、

值）进行Spearman秩相关分析，结果发现，VEGF与

*、

值之间的r为0.473、-0.432，相关系数假设检验差异有统计学意义（

均＜0.05）；而MVD与

*、

值之间的r为-0.072、0.215，相关系数假设检验差异无统计学意义（

均＞0.05）。

结论：

IVIM可辅助诊断直肠癌T分期情况及直肠癌淋巴结转移的状态，VEGF与

*值具有正相关性，与

值有负相关性，在一定程度上可成为术前无创性预测VEGF的影像学指标。

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Methods:

From June 2018 to March 2019

97 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery in Cancer Hospital

Xinjiang Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University were selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and IVIM before surgery

and pathological staging after surgery. Postoperative pathological staging

the differences in preoperative IVIM parameters of rectal cancer at different T stages

lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis

and the correlation of IVIM parameters (

* and

values) with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvascular density (MVD) were analyzed.

Results:

The preoperative IVIM parameters (

values) of rectal cancer were statistically different between different T stages (T

and T

) (both

＜0.05); single factor analysis of variance found that Dvalue was the highest in the T stage (T

and T

); the multi-factor logistic analysis found that the

* and f parameters had the highest comprehensive diagnostic efficiency. Between the two groups of simple T

and T

phases

the IVIM parameters

and

* values were statistically different (both

＜0.05); univariate analysis of variance found that the

value had the highest diagnostic efficacy in T

and T

phases; multivariate logistic analysis found that the IVIM parameters

and

* had the highest comprehensive diagnostic efficiency. In lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis of rectal cancer

only the

value of IVIM parameters was statistically different (

＜0.05). One-way analysis of variance was performed on the

value with statistically significant differences in the comparison of lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis in rectal cancer. When the

value threshold was 0.782 10

-3

the area under curve (AUC) was 0.635 and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 67.65%. the negative predictive value (NPV) was 71.21%

sensitivity was 83.37%

and specificity was 49.26%. The VEGF and MVD analysis of postoperative specimens of 45 patients

and the spearman rank correlation analysis of VEGF

MVD and IVIM parameters (

* and

values) found that r between VEGF and

f values was 0.473

-0.432. The correlation coefficient hypothesis test was statistically significant (both

＜0.05). And r between MVD and

values was -0.072

0.215

and the correlation coefficient hypothesis test was not statistically significant (both

＞0.05).

Conclusion:

IVIM can assist in the diagnosis of T stage and lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer. VEGF has a positive correlation with

* value and a negative correlation with

value. To some extent

IVIM can be a noninvasive imaging index to predict VEGF before operation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1450

下载量

CNKI被引量

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

The value of multimodal imaging combined with CT, high-resolution MRI, and DWI in the diagnosis of postoperative anastomotic recurrence in rectal cancer

Annual progress in ultrasound clinical research on liver diseases in China in 2024

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: debates, focus areas and emerging perspectives

The diagnostic value of molecular imaging in treatment-related cardiotoxicity of malignancy

Prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer using MRI radiomics models based on multiple machine learning algorithms

Related Author

Lu LIU

Zejiang ZHANG

Hongming LUO

Lulu LUO

Qingsong MA

Hong HAN

Qing LU

Yuli ZHU

Related Institution

Department of Radiology, Ziyang Central Hospital

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University

Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering of Fudan University

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

AI问答

⁰