Diagnostic efficiency and inter-observer agreement among readers with variable experience of PI-RR system: using whole-mount histology after androgen deprivation therapy as reference
|更新时间:2025-12-15
|
Diagnostic efficiency and inter-observer agreement among readers with variable experience of PI-RR system: using whole-mount histology after androgen deprivation therapy as reference
Diagnostic efficiency and inter-observer agreement among readers with variable experience of PI-RR system: using whole-mount histology after androgen deprivation therapy as reference
以雄激素剥夺治疗(androgen deprivation therapy,ADT)后前列腺全组织切片为参考标准,评估前列腺磁共振成像局部复发报告(Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting,PI-RR)的诊断效能及观察者间的一致性。
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporti
ng (PI-RR) using whole-mount histology of prostate after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as the standard of reference.
Methods:
Totally 119 post-ADT prostate cancer patients underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before prostatectomy. Three radiologists analyzed MRI images independently
scoring imaging findings according to PI- RR. Diagnosis performances for detection of residual cancer were assessed on per-sector basis. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was compared among readers with
χ
2
test. Overall and pairwise interreader agreement in assigning PI-RR scores and residual cancer sector with score≥3 or 4 were evaluated by Cohen’s Kappa analysis.
Results:
Two hundred and nine sectors with residual cancer were found on histology. The sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value and negative predictive value at cutoff of score 3 ranged from 74.2% to 83.7%
86.4% to 92.7%
51.3% to 64.3%
and 95.4% to 96.9%
respectively
and at cutoff of 4
they ranged from 47.4% to 56.5%
97.9% to 98.6%
82.5% to 85.3%
and 91.6% to 92.9%
respectively. There was no significant difference among theCDR of readers. In PI-RR scores and detection of residual cancer sectors
overall interreader agreement was moderate for all readers
but agreement was higher between senior and intermediate readers (moderate to substantial) than between intermediate and junior readers (fair to moderate).
Conclusion:
MRI scoring with the PI-RR assessment provides accurate evaluation of prostate cancer after ADT
but readers’ experience influenced cancer diagnosis and interreader agreement.