
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
网络出版:2017-06-02,
纸质出版:2017-06-02
移动端阅览
胡飞翔, 胡婷丹, 童彤, 等. 基于CT图像纹理分析评价结直肠癌肝转移新辅助治疗后疗效的价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2017,26(2):106-113.
胡飞翔,胡婷丹,童彤,等. 基于CT图像纹理分析评价结直肠癌肝转移新辅助治疗后疗效的价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2017, 26(2): 106-113
目的:
探讨治疗前基线CT门静脉期图像的直方图分析预测结直肠癌肝转移(colorectal l i v e r metastasis,CRLM) 新辅助治疗后疗效的价值。
方法:
选取34例CRLM患者,共计132枚病灶,经FOLFOX(氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸钙+奥沙利铂)、FOLFIRI (氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸钙+伊立替康)或CapeOX(奥沙利铂+卡培他滨或卡培他滨单用)方案化疗。所有患者均接受至少两次常规腹部平扫加增强三期CT扫描,于化疗前4周内行CT基线扫描,化疗开始后2~3个月内行第2次扫描以评估疗效。对患者门静脉期CT图像进行直方图分析,依据实体肿瘤疗效评价标准(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors,RECIST)(Version 1.1)进行疗效评估,获得相应转移瘤的纹理参数,比较缓解与非缓解组患者治疗前基线CT直方图参数的差异。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析法计算各参数预测缓解的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预计值、阴性预计值、准确率及截断值。由两名放射科医师达成一致意见后勾画感兴趣区。
结果:
34例患者中,缓解组21例,非缓解组13例。缓解组的均值、方差、偏度和百分位数(10%、50%、90%、99%)低于非缓解组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<0.05);但峰度值和1%百分位数无显著差异(
P
=0.769、0.06)。90th百分位数在截断值为167时具有较高的准确率(81.82%),此时灵敏度、特异度、阳性预计值、阴性预计值及AUC分别为74.42%、95.65%、96.65%、66.97%和0.854。
结论:
CT门静脉期直方图分析对预测CRLM患者新辅助疗效具有潜在价值。
Objective:
To explore the value of histogram analysis of baseline CT portal images before treatment in predicting the response of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods:
Thirty-four patients (a total of 1
32 lesions) diagnosed with CRLM were retrospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX
FOLFIRI or CapeOX ). All patients underwent pre-treatment CT baseline scan withinfour weeks for primary tumor assessment and a second CT scan in 2 to 3 months
for response evaluation. Histogram of CT portal images of patients with CRLM was analyzed and response was mainly assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. The texture parameters of the metastatic tumor were analyzed statistically to find the differences in baseline CT histogram parameters between responding group and non-responding group before and after treatment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were depicted to characterize each parameter value in evaluating the treatment outcomes. The optimal cutoff value (obtained according to the maximal Youden index = sensitivity + specificity-1)
the corresponding sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value (PPV)
negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated. Regions of interests (ROIs) were manually drawn on the largest cross-sectional area of the primary lesions by two radiologists in consensus.
Results:
Twenty-one responding and 13 non-responding patients were evaluated. The values of mean
variance
skewness and percentile (10th
50th
90th
99th) in responding group were much lower than those in non-responding group (
P
0.05). The kurtosis and 1st percentile values between the two groups had no significant difference (
P
=0.769
P
=0.06
respectively). The optimal cutoff value for the accurate identification of responding patients was 167 for 90th percentile (74.42% sensitivity
95.65% specificity
96.97% PPV
66.67% NPV
81.82% accuracy
and 0.854 area under curve
respectively).
Conclusion:
CT histogram analysis of baseline CT portal images before treatment can help to predict the response of patients with CRLM after neoadjuva
nt chemotherapy.
0
浏览量
1545
下载量
16
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621