Ability of attenuation measurement and histogram analysis in differentiating minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma on unenhanced CT
少脂肪肾AML的平均密度及其直方图10%、25%和50%密度均显著高于肾嫌色细胞癌和乳头状肾细胞癌,但10%/平均密度比值无差异。以平均密度及其直方图10%、25%和50%密度鉴别少脂肪肾AML与肾嫌色细胞癌的ROC曲线的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.80、0.76、0.78和0.82,各参数效能无明显差异;鉴别少脂肪肾AML与乳头状肾细胞癌的AUC为0.69、0.70、0.68和0.72,各参数效能差异无统计学意义。
To investigate the ability of attenuation measurement and histogram analysis in differentiating minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma (AML) from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on unenhanced CT.
Methods:
Unenhanced CT images of 18 minimal-fat AML
15 chromophobe RCC and 22 papil
lary RCC were analyzed. The mean attenuation and relative histogram parameters (10th
25th
50th values and 10th/mean value) of the lesions were measured and calculated. The parameters were compared among AML
chromophobe RCC
and papillary RCC. The parameters with significant difference would be applied in differentiating of minimal-fat AML from two RCCs. The effeciency of the parameters for differentiation was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results:
The mean and 10th
25th
50th values of the attenuation of minimal-fat AML were significantly higher than chromophobe and papillary RCCs
but no significant difference was found in 10th/mean value. The values of area under ROC curve (AUC) of the parameters for differentiating AML from chromophobe RCC were 0.80
0.76
0.78
0.82
respectively
and no significant difference was observed among them. The AUC values of the parameters for differentiating AML from papillary RCC were 0.69
0.70
0.68
0.72
respectively
and no significant difference wasobserved among them.
Conclusion:
On unenhanced CT attenuation measurement and histogram analysis provide more parameters for distinguishing minimal-fat AML from papillary and chromophobe RCCs