回顾并分析2018年1月2020年12月行CESM检查的乳腺影像报告和数据系统(Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System,BI-RADS)3~5类乳腺单发肿块。所有患者均行头尾(craniocaudal,CC)位(早期,T1)、内外斜(mediolateral oblique,MLO)位(晚期,T2)摄影,随后测量减影图病灶的强化灰度值(lesion grey value,LGV)。并根据LGV在两个时相的变化量评估病灶的动态强化特点。同时分析病灶CESM低能图及减影图形态学特征。最后以病理学检查结果为金标准,评价CESM(低能图及减影图)、LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+动态强化、CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
、CESM+动态强化、CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+动态强化对乳腺单发肿块的诊断效能。
结果:
160例患者全为女性,共检出160个肿块,恶性病灶118个,良性肿块42个。CESM、LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+动态强化、CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
、CESM+动态强化及CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+动态强化的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.917、0.748、0.922、0.919及0.927。单独CESM诊断的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确度均高于LGV
To find out the benefits of adding morphology and quantitative analysis onto contrast enhancement spectral mammography (CESM) in diagnosis of single breast masses.
Methods:
All patients found with Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) category 3-5 breast mass-like lesions by CESM from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospective analyzed. All cases were performed craniocaudal (CC) view (early phase
T1) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) view (later phase
T2). The quantitative enhanced lesion gray value (LGV) was measured within each phases recombined image. Based on their changes
the kinetic enhancement pattern was assessed among the two phases. And the diagnostic performance was subsequently measured.
Results:
A total of 160 breast masses were found in 160 female patients
and 118 masses were malignant and 42 masses were benign. The areas under curves (AUC) of CESM
LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+kinetic enhancement
CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
CESM+kinetic enhancement
and CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+kinetic enhancement was 0.917
0.748
0.922
0.919 and 0.927
respectively. By evaluatingthe diagnostic value
sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value
and accuracy from morphological categorization were all higher than those of the LGV combined with kinetic enhancement (91.5%
vs
75.4%
83.3%
vs
64.2%
93.9%
vs
85.5%
77.7%
vs
48.2%
and 89.3%
vs
72.5%). While
the sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value
and accuracy of the CESM+LGV
T1
+LGV
T2
+kinetic enhancement were 96.6%
80.9%
93.4%
89.4% and 92.5%
respectively.
Conclusion:
For the BI-RADS 3-5 breast masses
adding the CESM quantitative ana
lysis with the CESM morphology can improve confidence level