
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 四川省肿瘤医院 . 研究所,四川省癌症防治中心,电子科技大学医学院核医学科,四川,成都,610041
2. 川北医学院医学影像学院,四川,南充,637000
网络出版:2023-09-13,
纸质出版:2023-09-13
移动端阅览
江雪梅,谌佳琪,彭小娟,等. 18 F-FDG PET/CT影像组学特征对肺腺癌患者EGFR基因突变的预测价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2023, 32(4): 373-380 https://doi.
org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2023.04.010
江雪梅,谌佳琪,彭小娟,等. 18 F-FDG PET/CT影像组学特征对肺腺癌患者EGFR基因突变的预测价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2023, 32(4): 373-380 https://doi. DOI: 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2023.04.010.
org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2023.04.010 DOI:
目的:
分析治疗前
18
F-FDG正电子发射体层成像(positron emission tomography,PET)/计算机体层成像(computed tomography,CT)影像组学特征在预测肺腺癌患者表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,
EGFR
)基因突变状态中作用。
方法:
回顾并分析2017年1月—2021年3月于四川省肿瘤医院就诊的212例(男性115例,女性97例,年龄32~82岁,平均61岁)肺腺癌患者治疗前
18
F-FDG PET/CT图像及
EGFR
表达资料。将患者按7∶3随机分为训练集(148例)及验证集(64例)。用LIFEx软件手动逐层勾画CT图像的感兴趣区,半自动勾画PET图像的感兴趣区,并提取图像特征参数,使用最小绝对收缩与选择算子(least absolute shrinkage and selection operator,LASSO)及10折交叉验证进行特征筛选并计算模型最佳的λ值,选出最佳的特征参数,使用logistic逐步回归建立模型。使用PET参数、CT参数及PET+CT参数建立3种模型,并结合临床特征即性别、吸烟史建立联合模型。用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析模型预测
EGFR
突变的价值,获得曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)、灵敏度、特异度、准确度,用DeLong检验比较上述模型的AUC。
结果:
212例肺腺癌患者中,EGFR基因野生型86例(38.68%),
EGFR
基因突变型126例(61.32%)。从PET参数、CT参数、PET+CT参数中分别筛选出3、2、5个参数构成回归模型,三者验证集的AUC分别为0.719、0.717、0.723,灵敏度分别为76.9%、82.1%、74.4%,特异度分别为68.0%、60.0%、72.0%,准确度分别为67.2%、71.9%、73.4%。加入临床特征后建立联合模型,三者的AUC分别为0.701、0.748、0.704,灵敏度分别为84.6%、71.8%、61.5%,特异度分别为52.0%、72.0%、76.0%,准确度分别为67.2%、73.4%、67.2%。PET、CT、PET/CT模型间的AUC差
异学无统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论:
PET、CT、PET/CT影像组学特征参数与肺腺癌
EGFR
基因表达状态相关,PET/CT预测模型的预测效能稍高。
Objective:
To assess the value of pre-therapy
18
F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic features in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor (
EGFR
) gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed on
18
F-FDG PET/CT images and
EGFR
gene status of 212 patients (115 males and 97 females
aged range: 32-82
averageage: 61 years) with pulmonary adenocarcinoma Between January 2017 and March 2021. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (148 cases) and a validation set (64 cases) in a 7∶3 ratio. LIFEx software was used to delineate the volume of interest of CT and PET images and extract image features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and ten-fold cross- validation were used to conduct feature screening and calculate the best λ value of the model. The best feature parameters were selected and logistics regression was used to establish the model. PET parameters
CT parameters and PET+CT parameters were used to establish three models
and combined with clinical characteristics
namely gender and smoking history
to establish combined models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated and the area under curve (AUC)
sensitivity
specificity and accuracy were obtained. DeLong test was used to compare the AUC of the above models.
Results:
Among 212 patients with lung adenocarcinoma
86 patients (38.68%) were
EGFR
wild-type and 126 patients (61.32%) were
EGFR
mutant. There were 3
2
5 parameters were selected from PET parameters
CT parameters and PET+CT parameters respectively to form the regression model. The AUCs of the validation sets of the three models were 0.719
0.717%
0.723
with sensitivities of 76.9%
82.1%
74.4%
spe
cificities of 68.0%
60.0%
72.0%
accuracies of 67.2%
71.9%
73.4%
respectively. The combined models were established after adding clinical features
and the AUCs of the three were 0.701
0.748
0.704
with sensitivities of 84.6%
71.8%
61.5%
specificities of 52.0%
72.0%
76.0%
and accuracies of 67.2%
73.4%
67.2%
respectively. There was no significant difference in AUC between PET
CT and PET/CT models (
P
<0.05).
Conclusion:
PET
CT and PET/CT radiomic features were correlated with
EGFR
gene expression status in lung adenocarcinoma
and PET/CT model had a slightly higher predictive efficiency.
0
浏览量
439
下载量
5
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621