
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
网络首发:2024-09-12,
纸质出版:2024-09-12
移动端阅览
刘洪艳,李凡,杜联芳. 超声造影对卵巢附件肿块调整O-RADS分级的价值研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2024, 33(4): 425-431 https://doi.
org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2024.04.013
刘洪艳,李凡,杜联芳. 超声造影对卵巢附件肿块调整O-RADS分级的价值研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2024, 33(4): 425-431 https://doi. DOI: 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2024.04.013.
org/10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2024.04.013 DOI:
目的:
探讨超声造影(contrast-enhanced ultrasound,CEUS)在调整卵巢附件肿块的卵巢附件超声报告和数据风险系统(Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System,O-RADS)分级中的应用价值。
方法:
选取上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院接诊的98例行二维超声及CEUS检查的卵巢-附件肿块患者作为研究对象,二维声像图通过O-RADS进行评估,并分析CEUS灌注特征。以病理学检查结果为金标准,绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析O-RADS及O-RADS联合CEUS对卵巢-附件恶性肿块的诊断效能。
结果:
病理学检查结果显示恶性肿块25例,良性肿块73例。恶性肿块囊壁/分隔厚度≥3 cm、有实性成分、乳头状突起≥4个、血流评分3~4分、有腹水者占比分别为68.00%、80.00%、24.00%、60.00%、60.00%,均显著高于良性肿块的8.22%、27.40%、5.48%、4.11%、5.48%,均
P
0.05。在CEUS征象方面,良性肿块主要表现为无/低/等的均匀增强,且为慢/同步增强;恶性肿块主要表现为不均匀的高增强,且为快速增强。ROC曲线显示O-RADS+CEUS诊断卵巢-附件恶性肿块的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)大于O-RADS(0.972
vs
0.860,
P
<0.05)。与O-RADS相比,O-RADS+CEUS诊断卵巢-附件恶性肿块的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确度明显更高,分别为95.03%、96.78%、92.02%、96.84%和96.17%(
P
<0.05)。2名超声科医师对灰阶超声、灰阶超声+CEUS的O-RADS分类结果评估均有较高的一致性(Kappa=0.885、0.871)。
结论:
超声O-RADS分类可较为准确地判定卵巢-附件肿块风险分层,增加CEUS检查可调整O-RADS分级,进一步提高诊断的准确度。
Objective:
To explore the application value of contrast-enhanced ultr
asound (CEUS) in adjusting the Ovarian- Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) grading for ovarian adnexal masses.
Methods:
A total of 98 patients in Shanghai General Hospital
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine with ovarian adnexal masses who underwent two-dimensional ultrasound and CEUS examinations were selected as the study subjects. The two-dimensional ultrasound images were evaluated through O-RADS and CEUS perfusion characteristics were analyzed. With pathological diagnosis as the gold standard
the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drew
and the diagnostic efficacy of O-RADS and O-RADS+CEUS in ovarian accessory malignant tumors were analyzed.
Results:
The pathological results showed 25 cases of malignant masses and 73 cases of benign masses. The proportion of malignant masses with cyst wall/septal thickness ≥3 cm
solid components
papillary protrusions≥4
blood flow score 3-4
and ascites were 68.00%
80.00%
24.00%
60.00%
and 60.00%
respectively
which were significantly higher than those of benign masses with 8.22%
27.40%
5.48%
4.11%
and 5.48%
all
P
<0.05. In terms of CEUS signs
benign masses mainly exhibit uniform enhancement of no/low/equal
and slow/synchronous enhancement; Malignant masses are mainly characterized by uneven high enhancement and rapid enhancement. The ROC curve showed that the area under curve (AUC) value of O-RADS+CEUS in diagnosing ovarian adnexal malignant masses was higher than that of O-RADS (0.972 vs 0.860
P
<0.05). Compared with O-RADS
O-RADS+CEUS has significantly higher sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value
and accuracy in diagnosing ovarian adnexal malignant masses
and they were 95.03%
96.78%
92.02%
96.84%
and 96.17% respectively (
P
<0.05). Two ultrasound physicians had high consistency in evaluating the O-RADS classification results of grayscale ultrasound and grayscale ultrasound+CEUS (Kappa=0.885
0.871).
Conclusion:
Ultrasound O-RADS classification can accurately determine the risk stratification of ovarian adnexal masses. The addition of CEUS can adjust the O-RADS grading
further improving the accuracy of diagnosis.
0
浏览量
406
下载量
2
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621