<0.05]。超声GI-RADS分级、CA19-9、CA125、联合诊断的准确度分别为86.00%、76.00%、72.00%、97.00%。同时,经ROC曲线分析,超声GI-RADS分级、CA19-9、CA125及联合诊断的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.833、0.689、0.667、0.939。
结论:
在诊断卵巢肿瘤良恶性时联合超声GI-RADS分级和肿瘤标志物,可提高诊断准确度。
Abstract
Objective:
To explore the value of Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS) grading and tumor markers in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian tumors in children.
Methods:
The ultrasonographic examination and the detection results of cancer antigen (CA) 125 and CA19-9 in 100 cases of ovarian tumo
rs in children were retrospectively analyzed. The level of benign and malignant tumor markers and the ultrasonographic features were compared. At the same time
the efficacy of various diagnostic methods was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results:
CA19-9 and CA125 in malignant group were higher than those in benign group [(81.61±9.14) kU/L
vs
(19.55±4.85) kU/L
t
=34.552; (68.42± 6.15) kU/L
vs
(25.71±5.31) kU/L
t
=23.747;
P
<0.05]. The diagnostic accuracy of GI-RADS grading
CA19-9
CA125
and combined diagnosis was 86.00%
76.00%
72.00%
97.00%. At the same time
by ROC curve analysis
the area under curve (AUC) of GI-RADS grading
CA19-9
CA125
and combined diagnosis in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors were 0.833
0.689
0.667
and 0.939
respectively.
Conclusion:
Combining GI-RADS grading and tumor markers can improve the diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian tumors.